New Conlang

So Rayanese is on the back burner as I develop a new conlang based on new whims.  I haven’t gotten rid of Rayanese; it still lives in digital suspension with other conlangs of mine.
Like Rayanese, this new language, so far, it looking to be very European-ish in its grammar.  This language will also be highly inflectional.  With reference to its phonology, its consonant inventory is similar to Rayanese, but its vowel are reduced to the five basic vowels of Spanish: /a e i o u/.
I borrowed ideas from my other conlangs and decided I wanted more variety and diversity in my inflectional morphology.  I developed 7 noun declensions (with 8 cases) and 3 verb conjugations (compared to Rayanese’s 2 noun declensions and 1 verb conjugation).
I have decided on the present and past indicative forms of verbs, but I am not set on what my synthetic verb forms will be.  Should I have a imperfective vs. perfective verb system, like Latin?
I am thinking of having 7 tense/aspect combinations: present, aorist (simple past), past imperfect, (present) perfect, future, past anterior and future anterior.  I believe the last four of those tense will use some sort of affixation (probably suffixes).  I still need to set up what sort of system of stems I will use to form these tenses.
In some of my other conlangs, I have gone a bit crazy in creating too many affixes for too many aspects.  I am going to stick to the aforementioned tense/aspect combinations and express other shades of meanings with periphrastic constructions and adverbs.
For verb moods, there will be indicative, subjunctive and imperative.  The indicative will have all tense/aspect combinations, and the other moods will probably be missing at least the aorist.  There may be an optative mood.  I am inclined to use some sort of affixation for the non-indicative moods.
More later!

The -al declension

I have decided to add even more variation to the noun/adjective declension system.  For nouns whose nominative singular form ends in –r, the plural morpheme changes to –al instead of –ar.  We’ll use the noun ayndir light, to demonstrate it.

Case	Singular	Plural
nominative	ayndir	ayndiral
accusative	ayndirïk	ayndiralga
genitive	ayndirïs	ayndirazla
dative	ayndirïc	ayndiralja
instrumental	ayndirïv	ayndiravla
allative	ayndirïp	ayndiralba
ablative	ayndirïd	ayndiralda
locative	ayndirïks	ayndiralksa

We can thus demonstrate the different plural nominative forms with the nouns for cars, days, lights (all masculine inanimate nouns): ashabun, bözar, ayndiral

Rayanese Determiners and Animacy

I am considering having some of Rayanese determiners differentiate for animacy, as the 3rd person pronouns already do:

	singular	plural
3p animate	ko*	jo
3p inanimate	so	ho

I have already decided to change the 3p animate singular pronoun from lo to ko.  I think it would be neat to have these pronouns double as the definite article, hence they would indicate animacy as well as gender, number and case.  In general, Rayanese nouns are ‘animate’ if they refer to a sentient being or an animal, or a fantastic/supernatural being.

The current basic list of other determiners are listed below:

	determiner
indefinite article	ziki
proximate “this”	co
medial “that”	do
distal “yon(der)”	duyo
“other”	moto
partitive article	yo

I have added a partitive article, yo.  Now, how to make these determiners, as well as the relative and interrogative pronouns po and tho reflect animacy?  How about a suffix, –ino?

	inanimate	animate
indefinite article	ziki	zikino/kino**
definite article***	so, ho	ko, jo
partitive article	yo	yino
proximate det. “this”	co	cino
medial det. “that”	do	dino
distal det. “yon(der)”	duyo	duyino
“other”	moto	motino
relative pronoun	po	pino
interrogative pronoun	tho	thino

**kino being a short form for zikino.

***For the definite articles, the first article listed is singular, the second is plural.  All other forms decline normally for gender, number and case.

A couple of quick examples:

su ashabu- the car ; ku deru – the man

cu ashabu – this car ; cinu deru – this man

Rayanese Vowel Inventory

Since I have been revising so much of Rayanese lately, I’ve been thinking about revising part of the phonology, specifically the vowel inventory.

Previously, these were the vowels:

Spelling	X-Sampa
a	a
e	e
i	i
o	o
u	u
ä	{ (American English cat)
ö	2
ü	y
ï	I
ë	E

I want to get rid of the front rounded vowels, [2] and [y].  I will replace them with [O] and [U] but keep spelling the same.  I am undecided about a possible schwa [@].  I will also update my phonology page with some more information on diphthongs.

Possession

Rayanese possession isn’t anything special.  Rayanese uses possessive determiners and pronouns derived from the genitive standard personal pronouns.  I did change the personal pronouns mainly to have distinct plural stems for the 3rd person forms.  Here is the new set of personal pronouns (leaving out the reflexive and reciprocal forms):

	singular	plural
1st	mo	wo
2nd	to	vo
3rd animate	lo	jo
3rd inanimate	so	ho

These pronouns can change gender to agree with their antecedent, like –o adjectives. For example, to you (neuter.), tu you (masc.), ta you (fem.).

From these we derive the possessive determiners and pronouns:

	singular	plural
1st	mosi	wosi
2nd	tosi	vosi
3rd animate	losi	josi
3rd inanimate	sosi	hosi

These decline like -i adjectives.

mos huz – my male twin ; mosen huzen – my female twins.

With all these updates, I should update my main conlang site!

Still working on morphology

I wonder if working on morphology is my favorite part of conlanging – I seem to spend a lot of time on it!  Anyway, I worked a bit on Rayanese verb and noun morphology.

For verbs, I decided to add several aspects, to give more information on a singular verb form.  This is what my verb aspect suffix table looks like now:

neutral	-
perfect	-ke
recent perfect (“just” completed action)	-kay
progressive	-ga
habitual	-yo
prospective (“about to”)	-ya
inchoative/inceptive (“start to”)	-fu
cessative/terminative (“stop”)	-hi
completive (“finish”)	-ha

Verbs aspects are in the second suffix slot, after the optional causative suffix.  I can give an example of these aspects using the verb skat to eat in the 1sg present indicative form:

skaf	I eat
skakef	I have eaten
skakayf	I just ate / I have just eaten
skagaf	I am eating
skayof	I usually eat
skayaf	I am about to eat
skafuf	I start to eat / I am starting to eat
skahif	I stop eating
skahaf	I finish eating

For noun morphology, I decided to introduce some metathesis to liven up the noun declensions just a little.  The metathesis occurs in the genitive and instrumental plural forms.  Here I’ll use the plurals of huz male twin and deru man as examples":

nominative	huzar	derun
accusative	huzarga	derungu
genitive	huzazra	deruznu
dative	huzarja	derunju
instrumental	huzavra	deruvnu
allative	huzarba	derumbu
ablative	huzarda	derundu
locative	huzarksa	derunksu

Coming up soon, how to deal with possession!

Still working on Rayanese Noun Plurals

I’m continuing to work on Rayanese noun plurals.  I have gotten to having two main noun (and adjective) declensions, one with plurals in –ar (basically nouns whose nominative singular form ends in a consonant) and one with plurals in –n (nominative singulars end in a vowel). I’ll use the nouns huz male twin and deru man to illustrate where I’ve gotten to:

Current plural forms (-ar and –n declinations respectively):

nominative	huzara	derunu
accusative	huzarka	derunku
genitive	huzarsa	derunsu
dative	huzarca	deruncu
instrumental	huzarva	derunvu
allative	huzartsa	deruntsu
ablative	huzarda	derundu
locative	huzarksa	derunksu

The consonantal suffixes that represent the non-nominative cases are unchanged from the singular forms.  I am considering voicing some of them to differentiate them a bit more from the singular form:

huz (-ar declension)

	singular	plural
nominative	huz	huzara
accusative	huzïk	huzarga
genitive	huzïs	huzarza
dative	huzïc	huzarja
instrumental	huzïv	huzarva
allative	huzïts	huzardza
ablative	huzïd	huzarda
locative	huzïks	huzarksa

deru (-n declension)

	singular	plural
nominative	deru	derunu
accusative	deruk	derungu
genitive	derus	derunzu
dative	deruc	derunju
instrumental	deruv	derunvu
allative	deruts	derundzu
ablative	derud	derundu
locative	deruks	derunksu

I am still not sure if I want to voice those consonants. In the future, I may also have more declensions just make the language appear less regular.